Se creó el “Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos”

Por Resolución 126/2015 (B.O. 18/3/2015), se creó el “Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos”, dirigido a ciertos productores de granos, quienes podrán resultar beneficiarios de dicho programa en caso de cumplir con los requisitos establecidos en el art. 2 de la citada resolución.

Conforme se expresa en los considerandos de la norma en comentario, esta medida se enmarca en «las políticas del Estado destinadas a promover el crecimiento económico y el desarrollo, incentivando la inversión productiva y la demanda.» Asimismo, se indica que «usualmente, los pequeños productores tienen mayores costos, menor acceso a financiamiento y cuentan con menor poder de negociación frente al sector industrial, comercializador y exportador» …teniendo en cuenta la situación descripta, en consonancia con las decisiones políticas llevadas a cabo por el Gobierno desde el 2003, en miras a impulsar la distribución equitativa del ingreso y promover el desarrollo de las economías regionales, resulta necesaria la creación de un programa de estímulo dirigido a los pequeños productores de granos, que tiene por objetivo principal mejorar los ingresos económicos de aquellos productores que hubieren obtenido hasta un total acumulado de SETECIENTAS TONELADAS (700 t) de trigo, soja, maíz y girasol en el territorio de la REPÚBLICA ARGENTINA, en la campaña agrícola 2013/2014.»

En tal sentido se resolvió:

(ACLARACIÓN: LOS ARTÍCULOS 1, 3 Y 5 DE LA RESOLUCIÓN 126/2015 FUERON SUSTITUIDOS POR LOS TEXTOS DISPUESTOS MEDIANTE RESOLUCIÓN 175/2015 -B.O. 30/3/2015-).
Artículo 1° — Créase en el ámbito de la SECRETARÍA DE COMERCIO del MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA Y FINANZAS PÚBLICAS el “Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos”, destinado a otorgar compensaciones económicas a aquellos pequeños productores que hubieren obtenido hasta un total acumulado de SETECIENTAS TONELADAS (700 t) de trigo y/o soja y/o maíz y/o girasol en el territorio de la REPÚBLICA ARGENTINA, en la campaña 2013/2014.
Art. 2° — Podrán ser beneficiarios del Programa aprobado por el Artículo 1°, las personas físicas o jurídicas que hubieren producido trigo y/o soja y/o maíz y/o girasol en el territorio de la REPÚBLICA ARGENTINA, y que cumplan con los siguientes requisitos: a) Haber producido por un volumen de hasta SETECIENTAS TONELADAS (700 t) acumuladas en la cosecha 2013/2014, tomando como base de cálculo lo producido en forma individual por la persona física o jurídica que solicitare el beneficio, independientemente de la cantidad de establecimientos rurales que explote, sean propios o de terceros. b) Encontrarse inscripto en la nómina de productores de la ADMINISTRACIÓN FEDERAL DE INGRESOS PÚBLICOS, entidad autárquica en el ámbito del MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA Y FINANZAS PÚBLICAS, según la Resolución General N° 2.750 de fecha 18 de enero de 2010 de ese Organismo Recaudador. c) Encontrarse debidamente inscripto de conformidad con lo establecido en el Artículo 9° de la presente medida.
Art. 3° — El “Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos” será de aplicación para el período comprendido entre los meses de “enero de 2015” a “diciembre de 2015”, inclusive, pudiendo ser prorrogado.
Art. 4° — A los efectos del cálculo de la compensación que corresponda a cada pequeño productor, se determinan SIETE (7) estratos conforme las cantidades producidas de los granos mencionadas en el Artículo 2° y según se consigna en el ANEXO I que forma parte integrante del presente acto. Para la determinación de los estratos mencionados, para cada productor, sólo se tomará en cuenta la producción de los cultivos de soja, trigo, maíz y girasol de la campaña 2013/2014, según la información que se hubiere brindado oportunamente a la ADMINISTRACIÓN FEDERAL DE INGRESOS PÚBLICOS.
Art. 5° — El monto total en pesos a percibir por cada beneficiario del Programa quedará determinado por la multiplicación de su producción por el monto por tonelada estipulado en el ANEXO I de la presente, según su clasificación por estrato.
Art. 6° — El monto estipulado en el artículo precedente será pagado mensualmente, de acuerdo al porcentaje establecido para cada mes del Programa en el ANEXO II, que forma parte integrante de la presente medida. Dicho porcentual podrá incrementarse o disminuirse de acuerdo a lo estipulado en el Artículo 7°.
Art. 7° — Mensualmente la SECRETARÍA DE COMERCIO efectuará una estimación de la liquidación total de divisas esperada de los complejos de soja, trigo, maíz y girasol. En la primera estimación, adicionalmente, se calcularán, las sumas correspondientes a los meses no cancelados del programa. La SECRETARÍA DE COMERCIO contrastará el monto estimado con las sumas efectivamente liquidadas, de acuerdo a la información que produzca el BANCO CENTRAL DE LA REPÚBLICA ARGENTINA. En el supuesto en que la liquidación efectiva difiera de aquella que fuera estimada por la SECRETARÍA DE COMERCIO, el pago mensual a los productores será proporcional a esa diferencia; en ningún caso el monto total pagado al beneficiario durante la vigencia del Programa será superior al establecido en el Artículo 5°.
Art. 8° — Para el caso en que el mecanismo establecido en el Artículo 7° genere pagos acumulados menores al monto correspondiente a cada beneficiario de conformidad al Artículo 5°, se compensará el saldo pendiente en el cálculo del pago de diciembre de 2015, hasta arribar al monto total a percibir.
Art. 9° — Los interesados en participar del Programa deberán inscribirse a través de la página web oficial de esta repartición ministerial y completar la información que a tales efectos se determine oportunamente, con carácter de declaración jurada.
Art. 10. — La SECRETARÍA DE COMERCIO aprobará mensualmente los pagos correspondientes a los beneficiarios, los que serán efectuados a través de transferencia bancaria en forma mensual, a mes vencido. Por única vez, el primer pago incluirá los beneficios correspondientes a los meses no cancelados, desde el comienzo del Programa.
Art. 11. — Facúltase a la SECRETARÍA DE COMERCIO para dictar las normas reglamentarias y a suscribir los convenios que resulten necesarios para la implementación y ejecución del Programa.
Art. 12. — Los gastos que demande la financiación del presente Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos serán solventados con fondos del Tesoro Nacional, quedando limitados a un monto máximo total de PESOS DOS MIL QUINIENTOS MILLONES ($ 2.500.000.000).
Art. 13. — La presente medida tiene vigencia a partir de su publicación en el Boletín Oficial.
Art. 14. — Comuníquese, publíquese, dése a la Dirección Nacional del Registro Oficial y archívese. — Axel Kicillof.

ANEXO I
Estrato Toneladas Monto por tonelada
1 Hasta 100 $ 450
2 Más de 100 a 200 $ 383
3 Más de 200 a 300 $ 293
4 Más de 300 a 400 $ 180
5 Más de 400 a 500 $ 90
6 Más de 500 a 600 $ 69
7 Más de 600 a 700 $ 45
ANEXO II

Mes % Liquidación
ENE 7,00%
FEB 5,00%
MAR 7,00%
ABR 11,00%
MAY 12,00%
JUN 11,00%
JUL 10,00%
AGO 9,00%
SEP 8,00%
OCT 7,00%
NOV 6,00%
DIC 7,00%

25 comentarios de “Se creó el “Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos”

  1. Pingback: Se estableció la operatoria para el Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos - Tu Espacio Jurídico

  2. Pingback: Nuevas modificaciones al "Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos" - Tu Espacio Jurídico

  3. Pingback: Se creó el "Programa de Estímulo al Pequeño Productor de Granos - Fase 2.0" - Tu Espacio Jurídico

  4. Hey, you used to write excellent, but the last several posts have been kinda boring¡K I miss your tremendous writings. Past few posts are just a little out of track! come on!

  5. Involving me and my spouse we’ve owned additional MP3 players over the several years than I can count, which include Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etcetera. But, the previous couple years I’ve solved down towards a single line of players. Why? Considering that I was content towards explore how well-designed and entertaining in direction of hire the underappreciated (and greatly mocked) Zunes are.

  6. Nice post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely useful information particularly the last part 🙂 I care for such info a lot. I was looking for this certain info for a very long time. Thank you and good luck.

  7. The Zune concentrates on currently being a Moveable Media Player. Not a world-wide-web browser. Not a activity machine. Maybe within just the long term it’ll do even improved within these areas, still for presently it can be a Terrific path towards organize and pay attention in direction of your songs and films, and is with no peer inside that respect. The iPod’s strengths are its world-wide-web going to and apps. If those people good more compelling, perhaps it is your easiest choice.

  8. A person necessarily lend a hand to make significantly articles I’d state. That is the very first time I frequented your website page and so far? I amazed with the research you made to create this particular put up amazing. Great job!

  9. This is using a bit more subjective, however I considerably desire the Zune Market. The interface is colorful, has further more aptitude, and some neat functions together with ‘Mixview’ that allow on your own instantly check out similar albums, tunes, or other consumers equivalent to what you happen to be listening toward. Clicking upon just one of all those will center upon that products, and yet another established of «neighbors» will appear into impression, letting on your own towards navigate over researching as a result of identical artists, songs, or users. Talking of users, the Zune «Social» is way too suitable entertaining, enabling on your own identify other folks with shared choices and becoming buddies with them. By yourself then can pay attention to a playlist intended based on an amalgamation of what all your mates are listening in the direction of, which is far too fascinating. Individuals apprehensive with privateness will be relieved in direction of know by yourself can steer clear of the community from observing your personal listening patterns if by yourself so opt for.

  10. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your website? My website is in the very same area of interest as yours and my users would truly benefit from some of the information you present here. Please let me know if this ok with you. Cheers!

  11. I am going to products this study in direction of 2 designs of us residents: current Zune house owners who are looking at an update, and persons making an attempt in the direction of decide amongst a Zune and an iPod. (There are other gamers worth thinking of out there, which include the Sony Walkman X, nonetheless I assume this provides by yourself enough details toward produce an conscious determination of the Zune vs gamers other than the iPod line as nicely.)

  12. Zune and iPod: Greatest us citizens evaluate the Zune in direction of the Touch, however after watching how slim and remarkably tiny and light it is, I try out it toward be a as an alternative special hybrid that combines features of possibly the Touch and the Nano. It really is amazingly vibrant and attractive OLED show is a bit smaller sized than the contact screen, still the participant by itself feels rather a little bit smaller and lighter. It weighs concerning 2/3 as considerably, and is significantly scaled-down within width and top, even though currently being particularly a hair thicker.

  13. Thanks for writing this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Facebook. Thanks again for a great article!

  14. The new Zune browser is astonishingly optimistic, nevertheless not as Terrific as the iPod’s. It operates very well, still isn’t really as quick as Safari, and incorporates a clunkier interface. If on your own occasionally application upon getting the world-wide-web browser that is not an issue, but if you happen to be developing in direction of examine the world-wide-web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger sized exhibit and much better browser may possibly be crucial.

  15. This is becoming a bit further more subjective, but I much choose the Zune Sector. The interface is vibrant, has much more flair, and some neat characteristics such as ‘Mixview’ that enable oneself out of the blue check out related albums, music, or other users related toward what you’re listening to. Clicking upon one particular of those people will middle on that solution, and a further mounted of «neighbors» will arrive into check out, allowing for oneself in direction of navigate about studying as a result of similar artists, new music, or customers. Conversing of customers, the Zune «Social» is far too Wonderful exciting, permitting oneself track down other folks with shared choices and starting to be friends with them. Yourself then can hear in the direction of a playlist created primarily based on an amalgamation of what all your mates are listening to, which is way too exciting. Individuals nervous with privateness will be relieved toward notice on your own can keep away from the public towards viewing your particular person listening patterns if oneself so determine.

  16. I will equipment this overview to 2 styles of persons: present Zune property owners who are contemplating an improve, and us citizens attempting in the direction of make your mind up in between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players importance looking at out there, which includes the Sony Walkman X, yet I anticipate this features you sufficient information toward deliver an informed alternative of the Zune vs gamers other than the iPod line as very well.)

  17. Thanks for posting this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Twitter. Thanks again for a great article!

  18. Apple by now incorporates Rhapsody as an application, which is a perfect commence, yet it is already hampered through the lack of ability in direction of shop domestically on your iPod, and is made up of a dismal 64kbps bit value. If this changes, then it will rather negate this convenience for the Zune, nonetheless the 10 audio for each thirty day period will nevertheless be a massive plus in just Zune Pass’ favor.

  19. The fresh new Zune browser is surprisingly constructive, but not as beneficial as the iPod’s. It will work nicely, nonetheless isn’t really as instant as Safari, and incorporates a clunkier interface. If oneself once in a while program on using the world wide web browser that’s not an issue, yet if you might be developing in direction of browse the website alot against your PMP then the iPod’s much larger screen and better browser may possibly be crucial.

  20. Zune and iPod: Utmost Those evaluate the Zune in the direction of the Contact, however immediately after looking at how thin and surprisingly very little and mild it is, I take into consideration it to be a fairly exclusive hybrid that brings together attributes of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colourful and stunning OLED display screen is a little bit smaller sized than the touch screen, yet the participant itself feels relatively a little bit smaller and lighter. It weighs relating to 2/3 as significantly, and is significantly smaller within width and peak, When being basically a hair thicker.

  21. Hands down, Apple’s application retail store wins through a mile. It can be a substantial quantity of all forms of apps vs a as a substitute unsatisfied choice of a handful for Zune. Microsoft includes Ideas, especially in the realm of game titles, nonetheless I’m not certainly I’d need to have to bet on the foreseeable future if this component is critical in the direction of by yourself. The iPod is a substantially much better selection in just that case.

  22. I’ll products this review in the direction of Two models of Those people: recent Zune house owners who are taking into consideration an upgrade, and Those people attempting in the direction of decide amongst a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players great importance thinking about out there, like the Sony Walkman X, nevertheless I be expecting this offers oneself more than enough data towards deliver an conscious alternative of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as properly.)

  23. Palms down, Apple’s application store wins via a mile. It is really a huge number of all kinds of apps vs a as a substitute sad determination of a handful for Zune. Microsoft incorporates Designs, especially within the realm of games, nevertheless I’m not positive I’d have to have towards bet on the potential if this part is critical to on your own. The iPod is a a lot greater final decision within just that case.

  24. The Zune concentrates upon becoming a Portable Media Player. Not a world wide web browser. Not a game machine. Possibly inside the foreseeable future it’ll do even improved inside of all those areas, however for by now it is really a excellent path in direction of organize and hear in the direction of your songs and flicks, and is without peer within that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its world-wide-web visiting and purposes. If people solid even further powerful, possibly it is your great choice.

  25. I simply need to reveal to you that I am new to blogging and certainly loved your information. Very likely I am likely to remember your blog post . You undoubtedly have memorable article content. Like it for share-out with us your main url page

Los comentarios han sido cerrados.