Ley de Defensa del Consumidor: una empresa deberá indemnizar con u$s 56.000 a una inversionista que no recibió su departamento en la fecha estipulada

La decisión fue adoptada por una Cámara de la Provincia de Córdoba, haciendo aplicación de las disposiciones de la Ley de Defensa del Consumidor, y extendiendo la responsabilidad a la propietaria del inmueble. Se trató de un fideicomiso que no se encontraba formalmente instrumentado

Una empresa y su directora deberán indemnizar por daños y perjuicios, con 56.000 dólares (o su equivalente en pesos, más intereses), a una mujer con la que habían celebrado un contrato de fideicomiso destinado a la edificación de un edificio y que los había demandado porque no recibió el departamento en la fecha fijada para la entrega (agosto de 2010). La resolución fue adoptada por la Cámara 6º de Apelaciones en lo Civil y Comercial, que consideró que resultaban aplicables las previsiones de la Ley de Defensa del Consumidor (LDC), sobre todo teniendo en cuenta que, cuando se suscribió el contrato, “el fideicomiso no se encontraba instrumentado conforme a derecho”.

El tribunal hizo lugar al recurso de apelación planteado por la demandante contra la sentencia del Juzgado de 4º Nominación del mismo fuero, que solo había condenado a la firma Oliver Group S.A. Pero ahora, la Cámara hizo extensiva y corresponsable a la representante del fideicomiso que, al tiempo de la celebración del contrato, era propietaria del inmueble previsto para la construcción del edificio. En cambio, el tribunal rechazó el recurso promovido por los demandados.

Condición de consumidora
La empresa esgrimía que al caso debían aplicarse las disposiciones del Código Civil y Comercial (CCC) para la figura del fideicomiso y que a la demandante había que considerarla como “una inversionista” que asumió un riesgo. No obstante, en la resolución, el vocal Alberto Zarza afirmó que, en este caso, no había “obstáculo que impidiera considerar que la actora (demandante) ha sido una consumidora en la contratación”. Esto, en tanto la finalidad del contrato fue la compraventa de un departamento en propiedad horizontal o de una unidad funcional, que se vehiculizó a través de la figura del fideicomiso, al que la compradora tuvo que adherirse, según cláusulas predispuestas.

En la misma dirección, el camarista expresó que la empresa había incurrido en “un claro desprecio del deber de información (artículo 42, Constitución Nacional; art. 4, LDC, y art. 1110 del CCC), puesto que la demandante suscribió un contrato creyendo que se incorporaba como beneficiaria y fiduciante, sin poder advertir -de la documentación entregada- que el fideicomiso no existía y que, en consecuencia, tampoco existía patrimonio de afectación”.

Asimismo, a partir de la cita de un tratadista experto en fideicomisos inmobiliarios o no financieros, el vocal recalcó la doctrina que entiende que “el fideicomiso inmobiliario no es más que una aplicación del negocio fiduciario, estructurado ‘ad hoc’, para emprendimientos inmobiliarios, mayormente destinados a viviendas en propiedad horizontal, barrios cerrados, clubes de campos, etc., cuyos ‘beneficiarios’ o adquirentes son generalmente inversores o ahorristas no profesionales o consumidores finales, que financian el costo de la tierra y la construcción, más un plus de retribución o ganancia para el desarrollador u organizador”.

Situación de la propietaria del inmueble
Luego, el magistrado analizó la situación de quien, al tiempo de la celebración del contrato, era aún la propietaria del inmueble ubicado en el barrio General Paz. “Si bien la Sra. S. operó en representación de Oliver Group S.A., esta a su vez intervenía en carácter de fiduciaria de un fideicomiso que no se encontraba legalmente constituido. Así, en rigor, tampoco puede sostenerse que Oliver Group S.A. hubiera actuado en calidad de fiduciaria, ni que hubiera sido la titular del bien (inmueble) que no puede calificarse de bien fideicomitido”, argumentó.

En la misma línea, el camarista insistió en que, como no se encontraba constituido el fideicomiso, “ni siendo el inmueble un bien de la sociedad que ella (S.) representaba, debe calificarse a la titular registral del inmueble como proveedora, en los términos del art. 2 de la LDC”.

El vocal recalcó que cabía atribuirle responsabilidad a “la propietaria del inmueble que, a la postre, resultó ser la directora y presidente de la sociedad administradora de fondos, constructora del edificio y agente inmobiliaria de las unidades funcionales” y, asimismo, según las constancias de la causa, “fiduciante inversora y beneficiaria en el contrato de fideicomiso”. Ella, según la resolución, debe responder por “la falta de información cierta y detallada, adecuada y veraz suministrada a la demandante, sumado a los distintos roles o calidades de la Sra. S., incluida su relación sobre el inmueble al tiempo de la contratación”.

Obligación de informar del proveedor
El camarista, a cuyo voto se adhirieron sus pares (Walter Simes y Silva Palacio de Caeiro), manifestó que a la proveedora le cabía informar clara, cierta y detalladamente “toda circunstancia relevante para el contrato, incluido, en este caso, cuál era la situación registral y dominial del inmueble sobre el cual se emplazaba el proyecto edilicio y que el fideicomiso no se había instrumentado”.

La Cámara concluyó: “la redacción de los contratos predispuestos pudo inducir a la demandante al error de pensar que el fideicomiso se encontraba constituido, que el inmueble era un bien fideicomitido y que la sociedad efectivamente era la fiduciaria que iba a gestionar el boleto de compraventa a su favor. Asimismo, le entregaron dos anexos de especificaciones técnicas del Fideicomiso Canadian Plaza y un plano de la unidad, que llevan la firma de la Sra. S., sin aclaración que indicara representación alguna”.

Fecha: 14 de abril de 2016.
Causa: “Ahumada, Mariela Florencia c/Oliver Group S.A. y Otro – Ordinarios – Otros – Recurso de apelación”.

38 comentarios de “Ley de Defensa del Consumidor: una empresa deberá indemnizar con u$s 56.000 a una inversionista que no recibió su departamento en la fecha estipulada

  1. I simply want to tell you that I’m beginner to weblog and definitely enjoyed you’re blog. Most likely I’m likely to bookmark your website . You amazingly have exceptional article content. Thanks a lot for sharing your web page.

  2. I truly enjoy looking through on this site, it has superb articles . «The longing to produce great inspirations didn’t produce anything but more longing.» by Sophie Kerr.

  3. If you might be still upon the fence: seize your favourite earphones, brain down to a Excellent Get and check with toward plug them into a Zune then an iPod and watch which a person appears better to on your own, and which interface tends to make by yourself smile more. Then you may notice which is specifically for you.

  4. Hey, you used to write fantastic, but the last few posts have been kinda boring… I miss your super writings. Past few posts are just a little bit out of track! come on!

  5. In between me and my partner we have owned even more MP3 avid gamers earlier mentioned the many years than I can rely, like Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etcetera. But, the previous handful of years I have resolved down towards a person line of gamers. Why? Simply because I was pleased to check out how well-designed and fun towards retain the services of the underappreciated (and greatly mocked) Zunes are.

  6. I’ll gear this study in the direction of 2 products of people: latest Zune owners who are contemplating an enhance, and persons hoping to determine between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other avid gamers significance thinking about out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I expect this presents your self adequate info toward produce an informed final decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as properly.)

  7. Thanks for posting this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Facebook. Thanks again for a great article!

  8. Thank you for publishing this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Twitter. Thanks again for a great post!

  9. If you might be nevertheless on the fence: grab your favourite earphones, head down towards a Simplest Get and request in direction of plug them into a Zune then an iPod and watch which a single appears better in direction of oneself, and which interface results in you smile additional. Then you can expect to know which is specifically for you.

  10. I’ll products this review in direction of 2 styles of men and women: present Zune house owners who are looking at an improve, and humans attempting to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other gamers well worth thinking of out there, such as the Sony Walkman X, nevertheless I be expecting this provides on your own ample information and facts in direction of make an knowledgeable selection of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as perfectly.)

  11. Zune and iPod: Maximum men and women compare the Zune to the Contact, nevertheless at the time observing how skinny and amazingly reduced and gentle it is, I get it toward be a pretty special hybrid that brings together properties of either the Contact and the Nano. It can be Pretty colourful and lovely OLED exhibit is somewhat lesser than the contact screen, yet the participant by itself feels Very a little bit lesser and lighter. It weighs above 2/3 as a lot, and is appreciably scaled-down inside of width and height, despite the fact that currently being merely a hair thicker.

  12. Thanks for writing this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Twitter. Thanks again for a great article!

  13. Apple now incorporates Rhapsody as an app, which is a Terrific start out, however it is at present hampered by means of the incapability toward retailer regionally on your iPod, and consists of a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this alterations, then it will fairly negate this comfort for the Zune, nevertheless the 10 audio for every thirty day period will nonetheless be a substantial additionally within Zune Pass’ prefer.

  14. Sorry for the large critique, nonetheless I’m definitely loving the contemporary Zune, and be expecting this, as properly as the Wonderful evaluations some other Those incorporate written, will guidance by yourself make your mind up if it’s the directly determination for yourself.

  15. Zune and iPod: Greatest us citizens evaluate the Zune to the Touch, but following looking at how thin and surprisingly lower and mild it is, I consider it in direction of be a as an alternative exceptional hybrid that combines qualities of both of those the Touch and the Nano. It can be Pretty vibrant and attractive OLED display is slightly smaller than the touch screen, still the player itself feels reasonably a bit more compact and lighter. It weighs regarding 2/3 as considerably, and is considerably smaller inside of width and peak, whilst currently being only a hair thicker.

  16. Apple previously incorporates Rhapsody as an application, which is a superior start, still it is by now hampered via the inability towards store domestically on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps little bit cost. If this alterations, then it will to some degree negate this benefit for the Zune, nevertheless the Ten tunes per month will nevertheless be a large as well as inside Zune Pass’ choose.

  17. If you might be however on the fence: grab your favourite earphones, intellect down to a Ideal Invest in and question towards plug them into a Zune then an iPod and view which just one sounds improved towards on your own, and which interface produces on your own smile a lot more. Then you may comprehend which is directly for on your own.

  18. Fingers down, Apple’s app shop wins by a mile. It truly is a significant preference of all styles of programs vs a as a substitute unsatisfied selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft contains applications, specifically inside of the realm of game titles, nevertheless I’m not certainly I might have to have to bet on the foreseeable future if this portion is considerable in direction of on your own. The iPod is a substantially improved choice within that scenario.

  19. I like this blog very much, Its a rattling nice office to read and incur info . «What is called genius is the abundance of life and health.» by Henry David Thoreau.

  20. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently fast.

  21. Arms down, Apple’s application retail outlet wins via a mile. It is really a huge number of all kinds of applications vs a very sad number of a handful for Zune. Microsoft incorporates applications, in particular inside the realm of video games, however I’m not certainly I might need to have in direction of wager on the long term if this part is necessary in direction of your self. The iPod is a significantly superior determination within that scenario.

  22. Zune and iPod: Maximum Those review the Zune in the direction of the Touch, but when looking at how slender and incredibly very little and light-weight it is, I test it in direction of be a as a substitute exceptional hybrid that combines characteristics of possibly the Touch and the Nano. It is really very colourful and stunning OLED exhibit is a bit lesser than the contact screen, nonetheless the player by itself feels reasonably a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs around 2/3 as significantly, and is significantly lesser in just width and top, When currently being simply a hair thicker.

  23. Enjoyed reading through this, very good stuff, thankyou . «A man does not die of love or his liver or even of old age he dies of being a man.» by Percival Arland Ussher.

  24. I arrived over here from another website about traffic fine check and thought I might check out this page. I enjoy the things I see thus now I am following you. Getting excited about finding out about the site again.

  25. I truly appreciate this post. I have been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You have made my day! Thx again!

  26. Thank you for posting this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Twitter. Thanks again for a great post!

  27. Hi there, just turned out to be receptive to your website through Yahoo and bing, and have found that it’s very interesting. I will be grateful for should you decide persist these.

  28. I simply need to reveal to you that I am new to posting and extremely liked your write-up. Likely I am most likely to bookmark your blog post . You certainly have outstanding article materials. Love it for discussing with us your main site article

  29. Thank you for publishing this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Facebook. Thanks again for a great post!

  30. Zune and iPod: Utmost americans evaluate the Zune in the direction of the Contact, yet at the time seeing how slender and surprisingly low and mild it is, I try it in the direction of be a in its place unique hybrid that combines attributes of either the Contact and the Nano. It’s fairly colourful and magnificent OLED display screen is a little scaled-down than the contact screen, but the participant itself feels Very a little bit smaller sized and lighter. It weighs above 2/3 as a lot, and is significantly smaller sized in just width and top, though getting merely a hair thicker.

Los comentarios han sido cerrados.