Jurisprudencia de la CSJN: «Constructora Andrade Gutiérrez S.A. y otros c/ Provincia de Tierra del Fuego s/ contencioso administrativo»

El 11/11/2014 la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación resolvió hacer lugar al recurso extraordinario interpuesto por la actora y dejar sin efecto la sentencia dictada por el Superior Tribunal de Justicia de la Provincia de Tierra del Fuego, que hizo lugar al pedido del Fiscal de Estado declarando la caducidad de la instancia.

Para así decidir, el a quo consideró, en primer lugar, que la ampliación de demanda presentada por la interesada (con fecha 8 de noviembre de 2011) no había sido un acto idóneo para interrumpir el curso de la caducidad, porque «el escrito presentado no hace más que trasmitir al Tribunal la situación de progreso en las tratativas de las partes con la finalidad de solucionar de un modo amigable la controversia, pero en modo alguno se tradujo en una alteración o modificación de los términos en los que originariamente se había trabado el conflicto». En segundo lugar, entendió que la nueva prueba instrumental ofrecida por la actora -en particular, el decreto 2381/11- no tenía incidencia alguna en el pleito, pues «los considerandos del citado acto reflejan la expresa salvedad efectuada por la Provincia en orden a que las manifestaciones efectuadas en el mismo no implicaban reconocimiento alguno en el marco del reclamo judicial en trámite».

Antecedentes: La actora es cesionaria del contrato de obra pública firmado el 24 de septiembre de 1996, mediante el cual la Provincia de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur adjudicó la realización de la primera etapa de la construcción del Puerto Caleta La Misión. La provincia no logró encontrar financiación para la obra licitada y ello llevó a la suspensión y posterior paralización de los trabajos por casi diez años.

Ante estas circunstancias, el 15 de septiembre de 2009, la contratista promovió demanda ante el Superior Tribunal de Tierra del Fuego en los términos de los artículos 34, 53 Y 54 de la Ley de Obras Públicas 13.064 y solicitó la rescisión del contrato por culpa de la provincia, así como el pago de los daños y perjuicios correspondientes.

Con posterioridad, el 8 de noviembre de 2011, la actora denunció la existencia de hechos y documentos nuevos que, según consideró, eran trascendentes para evaluar la procedencia de la pretensión de su parte en el juicio, explicando que ante la paralización de los trabajos y la falta de fondos provinciales para reanudarla, la empresa Servicios Navieros Piedrabuena S.A. Ingeniería Marítima había manifestado SU interés en hacerse cargo del financiamiento y continuación de la obra. Tal había sido el motivo por el cual la provincia había decidido convocar a la actora y a Piedrabuena para tratar de solucionar el conflicto y continuar con la construcción del puerto.

A dichos efectos, suscribieron la Carta de Intención ratificada por decreto 2423/10 y la Carta Compromiso ratificada por decreto 358/11, para luego, en cumplimiento de esta última y con la’ autorización del Poder Ejecutivo provincial (decreto 2381/11), suscribir la actora y Piedrabuena sendos acuerdos de cesión de los derechos y obligaciones derivados del contrato de obra pública, así como de los derechos litigiosos que se encuentran en discusión en este expediente.

Según la actora, en el marco de las negociaciones, la provincia reconoció que no contaba con los recursos necesarios para financiar el emprendimiento. Entendió que ese reconocimiento era trascendente para evaluar la procedencia de la pretensión de su parte en este juicio. Y, por ende, ofreció los acuerdos y decretos mencionados como nueva prueba instrumental.

Fundamentos de la CSJN:

En primer lugar, la Corte recordó que si bien “lo atinente a la caducidad de la instancia remite a cuestiones fácticas y procesales ajenas, como principio, al recurso extraordinario previsto en el artículo 14 de la ley 48. Sin embargo, corresponde apartarse de tal regla cuando el examen de los requisitos para la procedencia de la perención se efectúa con injustificado rigor formal que afecta la garantía de defensa en juicio y el debido proceso”.

Aclarado ello, indicó que en el caso “el a quo ha actuado con excesivo rigor formal y no ha ponderado debidamente los fundados argumentos planteados por la apelante al responder el pedido de caducidad presentado por el Fiscal de Estado”.

Por el contrario, consideró que los elementos aportados por la actora  demostraron que la demandada había reconocido diversas cuestiones centrales debatidas en este pleito que debían ponderarse. De ello concluye “sin mayor esfuerzo, que las nuevas circunstancias denunciadas eran relevantes y conducentes para evaluar la procedencia de la pretensión”.

Por otro lado, recordó que “esta interpretación es la que mejor se ajusta al criterio sentado por esta Corte en materia de caducidad de instancia, según el cual se trata de un instituto de interpretación restrictiva, cuya procedencia corresponde descartar en los casos de duda razonable, en los que debe privilegiarse la solución que mantenga con vida el proceso”.

Concluyó recordando que “fue la provincia quien admitió que las obras estaban paralizadas desde el año 1999 por falta de fondos, e invitó a la actora a negociar en forma extrajudicial para intentar solucionar el conflicto y continuar con la construcción del puerto. Durante esas tratativas, la contratista actuó con voluntad conciliadora y aceptó la propuesta de cesión de derechos. Sin embargo, la promesa se frustró nuevamente, no por culpa de la actora, sino porque la provincia, una vez más, no consiguió los fondos para financiar la obra”.

En relación a la actuación desplegada en la causa por el fiscal, señaló que “En este contexto, que el Fiscal de Estado solicite la caducidad de la instancia y oponga la defensa de prescripción de la acción, resulta un inadmisible artificio tendiente a impedir un pronunciamiento sobre el fondo del pleito (Fallos: 313:1156; 319:1616; 329:1391; 335:1709)y,  por ende, una conducta contraria al principio de buena fe que informa y fundamenta todo nuestro ordenamiento jurídico y debe regir la conducta de los entes estatales”.

Concluye por todo lo expuesto que “el pronunciamiento impugnado ha incurrido en un exceso ritual que lo descalifica como acto judicial válido, con grave afectación de las garantías de defensa en juicio y del debido proceso, por lo que corresponde dejarlo sin efecto.”

 Ver texto completo del fallo

27 comentarios de “Jurisprudencia de la CSJN: «Constructora Andrade Gutiérrez S.A. y otros c/ Provincia de Tierra del Fuego s/ contencioso administrativo»

  1. I just want to mention I’m new to blogging and site-building and absolutely savored this web site. Probably I’m going to bookmark your blog . You really have awesome article content. Thank you for sharing with us your blog site.

  2. The when I just read a blog, I’m hoping that this doesnt disappoint me approximately this one. Get real, Yes, it was my method to read, but When i thought youd have something interesting to state. All I hear is a number of whining about something that you could fix should you werent too busy trying to find attention.

  3. Thank you for sharing superb informations. Your web site is so cool. I am impressed by the details that you¡¦ve on this site. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the info I already searched all over the place and just could not come across. What a great site.

  4. May I simply say what a relief to find somebody that truly understands what they are talking about on the web. You definitely understand how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More people ought to read this and understand this side of your story. I was surprised you’re not more popular given that you certainly possess the gift.

  5. If you’re continue to upon the fence: get your preferred earphones, intellect down in direction of a Least difficult Purchase and question towards plug them into a Zune then an iPod and check out which a person sounds much better towards your self, and which interface makes yourself smile additional. Then you can expect to notice which is right for yourself.

  6. I like what you guys are up also. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the superb works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my site 🙂

  7. Among me and my partner we have owned further MP3 gamers above the a long time than I can rely, which include Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etcetera. But, the past few years I have settled down in direction of just one line of players. Why? For the reason that I was satisfied to check out how well-designed and exciting in the direction of employ the service of the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  8. Amongst me and my spouse we’ve owned far more MP3 avid gamers above the several years than I can depend, which include Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, and so on. But, the last few many years I’ve fixed down towards 1 line of gamers. Why? Mainly because I was happy towards take a look at how well-designed and enjoyment to retain the services of the underappreciated (and greatly mocked) Zunes are.

  9. Thanks for publishing this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Twitter. Thanks again for a great post!

  10. This is having a bit more subjective, still I significantly like the Zune Market place. The interface is colorful, consists of a lot more aptitude, and some cool functions which include ‘Mixview’ that allow for by yourself abruptly perspective comparable albums, audio, or other users equivalent in direction of what you might be listening in the direction of. Clicking upon one particular of individuals will center on that products, and an additional preset of «neighbors» will occur into perspective, allowing for by yourself toward navigate around exploring via similar artists, new music, or end users. Chatting of users, the Zune «Social» is too Good enjoyable, allowing on your own uncover other people with shared preferences and turning out to be mates with them. Your self then can hear in the direction of a playlist manufactured primarily based on an amalgamation of what all your close friends are listening in the direction of, which is furthermore thrilling. These worried with privateness will be relieved in the direction of know you can keep away from the community towards seeing your particular person listening behaviors if yourself thus take.

  11. Apple presently includes Rhapsody as an application, which is a Terrific start out, nevertheless it is now hampered as a result of the lack of ability towards retailer locally upon your iPod, and is made up of a dismal 64kbps bit cost. If this variations, then it will relatively negate this convenience for the Zune, however the 10 music for each thirty day period will even now be a large as well as inside of Zune Pass’ desire.

  12. If you are continue to on the fence: get your favourite earphones, intellect down to a Suitable Get and check with to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and check out which 1 appears better in the direction of by yourself, and which interface generates on your own smile even further. Then you can realize which is directly for your self.

  13. Thanks for publishing this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Twitter. Thanks again for a great post!

  14. Zune and iPod: Optimum individuals review the Zune in direction of the Touch, but once observing how slender and amazingly small and light-weight it is, I consider it in direction of be a fairly special hybrid that brings together attributes of equally the Contact and the Nano. It is unbelievably colourful and attractive OLED display is somewhat smaller sized than the contact screen, nonetheless the player alone feels pretty a little bit smaller and lighter. It weighs in excess of 2/3 as considerably, and is noticeably scaled-down within just width and peak, despite the fact that staying precisely a hair thicker.

  15. The refreshing Zune browser is remarkably good, however not as superior as the iPod’s. It works nicely, however just isn’t as instantaneous as Safari, and incorporates a clunkier interface. If your self often program upon making use of the website browser which is not an issue, however if you might be developing towards read the world-wide-web alot in opposition to your PMP then the iPod’s greater display screen and improved browser may perhaps be vital.

  16. This is getting to be a bit further subjective, nonetheless I considerably desire the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, contains a lot more aptitude, and some great characteristics together with ‘Mixview’ that allow for by yourself out of the blue check out equivalent albums, tunes, or other end users equivalent in direction of what you are listening toward. Clicking on 1 of all those will heart upon that product or service, and yet another fastened of «neighbors» will come into look at, allowing you in the direction of navigate more than studying by means of equivalent artists, music, or people. Talking of end users, the Zune «Social» is way too superb enjoyment, enabling yourself locate many others with shared choices and turning into pals with them. On your own then can pay attention in the direction of a playlist intended based mostly upon an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening in direction of, which is in addition enjoyable. All those worried with privacy will be relieved to comprehend yourself can avert the community against looking at your particular person listening patterns if oneself so make a decision.

  17. Apple previously incorporates Rhapsody as an app, which is a fantastic commence, nonetheless it is at this time hampered via the incapability in the direction of retailer locally upon your iPod, and consists of a dismal 64kbps bit selling price. If this adjustments, then it will somewhat negate this ease for the Zune, nevertheless the Ten tunes for every thirty day period will still be a big additionally within Zune Pass’ prefer.

  18. Zune and iPod: Utmost human beings review the Zune to the Contact, still after looking at how skinny and astonishingly small and gentle it is, I think about it in direction of be a pretty distinctive hybrid that combines properties of the two the Touch and the Nano. It really is Pretty colourful and lovely OLED exhibit is a little more compact than the touch screen, nevertheless the participant itself feels Really a little bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as considerably, and is drastically more compact inside width and top, When becoming particularly a hair thicker.

  19. Involving me and my partner we’ve owned additional MP3 gamers earlier mentioned the yrs than I can count, which include Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etcetera. But, the last couple yrs I have resolved down in direction of 1 line of gamers. Why? Since I was content to locate how well-designed and fun towards employ the underappreciated (and broadly mocked) Zunes are.

  20. If you might be even now on the fence: get your preferred earphones, thoughts down to a Least complicated Purchase and ask toward plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which just one sounds improved towards oneself, and which interface can make oneself smile added. Then you can expect to understand which is directly for you.

  21. The clean Zune browser is remarkably superior, yet not as Terrific as the iPod’s. It functions perfectly, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If by yourself occasionally software upon using the website browser that is not an issue, yet if you happen to be building toward read the website alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger sized display and superior browser may possibly be crucial.

  22. I have not checked in here for some time because I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  23. Thanks for writing this awesome article. I’m a long time reader but I’ve never been compelled to leave a comment. I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Twitter. Thanks again for a great post!

  24. I simply need to reveal to you that I am new to posting and certainly liked your page. Most likely I am going to remember your blog post . You certainly have fabulous article materials. Appreciate it for discussing with us your current url report

  25. Needed to write you one very small remark to help thank you over again with your magnificent methods you have contributed at this time. This is certainly open-handed with people like you to convey extensively what exactly most of us could possibly have sold as an ebook to make some cash for themselves, most importantly given that you might well have done it if you considered necessary. Those tips as well acted like the fantastic way to be sure that many people have a similar dreams like my own to see way more in regard to this issue. I believe there are several more pleasurable situations up front for folks who see your site.

Los comentarios han sido cerrados.